Category: Personal Page 16 of 19

I Don’t Ask For Much From You, Do I? Well, Do I ? Oh, Okay, So Maybe I Do. BUT…

As regular readers will know, this year, I’ve decided to let someone else be the winner of Marie Claire’s ‘London’s Most Eligible Bachelor Award’. Which is to say, I’m getting married. To a frankly remarkable woman, who I could start to describe my admiration and affection for, but I’d just go on and on and you’d all start to get bored of me doing so, and besides I need to save the good stuff for my speech on the Wedding Day.

Anyway, not only is Jules (for that is her name) kind enough to take me on to try and keep me out of trouble, but she also has an eye on the welfare of society at large – by way of proving this, I’d point to the fact that on Sunday 20th July, for the third year in a row, she’s taking part in Cancer Research UK’s Race For Life .

She’ll be doing the 5K walk round Regent’s Park, and whilst the sight of me cheering at the finishing line will be some measure of motivation (especially if I’m holding a gin and tonic), I’m sure it would really help her to keep them feet a-movin’ if some of you folks out there in blogland would be kind enough to sling some money towards sponsoring her.

If you click here, you can sponsor my lovely almost-wife online, at a totally secure website which also allows your donation to bulk up through the magic of Gift Aid at no expense to you. And, of course, all the money will go towards Cancer Research UK’s vital work fighting cancer.

At the risk of making assumptions about any of you good people reading these words, I rather fear that most of us know someone who’s been affected by cancer (either themselves or someone they care about), and so I hope that you can see why this is a worthy cause. No donation too small. Or too large.

If the warm glow of philanthropy (Phil’s so much nicer than his sister Miss) isn’t enough for you, then perhaps I can entice you to sponsor Jules by pointing out that the sponsor page also features a picture of her, grinning like the cheerful type she is, so if you’ve ever thought you’d be interested to see what one of the more tolerant women in the world looks like (or maybe she’s just hard of hearing), then pop over to the sponsor site and sate your curiosity. And then you should sponsor her, because otherwise I’ll get all angry about you lookin at my bird, all right?

Thanks – by all means tell her I sent you, it’ll help me prove that the folks of my acquaintance are kinder and more generous than hers, and I’d like to be the one of the two of us who’s proven right (it’d be the first time, after all, and I’m keen and eager to see how it feels).

What I Did On My Not-Holiday, By John Aged 37 (And A Bit)

Well, it’s been a rather thin few days in terms of content, but I plead a sudden surge of activity in the paying job (leaving me several shades of knackered at the end of the day) combined with a lot of writing stuff to do. To summarise, then :

BBC Sharps
I didn’t hear back from Writersroom on Monday, and unless they sent me an e-mail headed something like ‘Free v1agr@’ and it got diverted to my Spam folder, I guess that means that I didn’t make it through to the next round. A pity, but doing the script was actually rather fun, and it was something of a learning experience, so I don’t feel it was wasted time on my part.

One change I might make to it, though, is to amend the name, as in an attempt to be clever and show it was purpose-written for the BBC Competition, I called it ‘Sharpes’ (after the pharmacy where the action took place), so I should probably re-name it for any future use. Then again, maybe that was part of the reason I didn’t make it through, I may have built the expectation that there’d be a number of characters for Sean Bean to play, and the first ten pages offer nothing of that nature.

Waterstones ‘What’s Your Story?’
My entry’s still on the gallery for this (page 13, last time I checked, or you can search by my surname), and given that over 4000 people have entered, the odds are rather against, but it was a fun thing to do (and my method was like something from ‘Take Hart’ or, for the younger amongst you, ‘Art Attack’), and who knows, I could be one of the two over-18 winners. I’ll probably post the jpeg of my story after the results are announced, so as not to dilute or jinx things, as it were.

Regardless of that, the book of all the authors’ postcards (plus the three winners) is for the dually worthwhile causes of Dyslexia Action and English PEN, and as it’s a mere fiver, I strongly urge you to go here and order a copy. Go on, it’s a good thing to do. You know you want to.

10 Word Crime Story
I didn’t have time to post about it here before the deadline of 5pm on Monday, but I managed to get a couple of entries in for this. It was a fun thing to do, and the small wordcount made it pleasantly restricted in terms of what you could write about – my usual logorrhoea was very much held at bay. I think the results are due in a couple of weeks, so I’ll share my entries after that, I suspect.

…So, as you can see, I haven’t just been doing nowt and making token gestures at posting here. But anyway, the hectic period seems to have passed, so we should be back to the usual frequency of posting (and probably the usual kind of content – sneering at adverts, book covers, and dodgy journalism; the very heights of sophistication) now.

Anyway, enough about me, how have you been?

Isn’t There Some Saying About The Cobbler’s Children Going Barefoot? (Or Is That A Load Of Cobblers?)

It’s been a very busy week, what with the 9-5 job being hectic, and the run-up to the deadline for the BBC Sharps competition, but in a way, it’s kind of interesting to see just how far my brain can bend before it snaps.

I’m almost done with my Sharps entry now, with a final read-through and formatting sort-out tonight before it goes in the post tomorrow (along with Father’s Day stuff – consider this reminder a social service). I’ve rather enjoyed a lot of the work for the Sharps script, I have to say – I was slightly worried I might have left it a smidgin too late, and that I’d feel I was turning in something sub-par (which always allows for the line ‘ah, well, if I’m honest it wasn’t my best work’ in the face of rejection, though that’s a pretty limp consolation really), but I’ve actually been enjoying the process of writing it (barring a few format-related hassles); having let the ideas and characters stew in my head for a week or so, it’s really felt like a case of just typing it out.

And when the actual process of writing is as straightforward and enjoyable as that, it reminds me why I love to write; the the words just flow from noggin to page (or monitor), and I start to see connections between plotlines I had previously thought were unrelated, ideas for jokes seem to come out of nowhere, and it’s one of the finest, and funnest, feelings in the world. Granted, there are many times when it doesn’t go like that, but this week it’s been fun (apart from spending all day in front of a computer and then going home and spending the evening in fr – ah, you guessed it). That does mean, of course, that I’ve been slightly less mentally and physically able to post extensively here – the paradox of being fired up and excited about writing in all its forms, but a little bit too tired to actually sit and post much to m’blog in the last day or two (hence the title above).

Anyway, my Sharps item will go in the post tomorrow, and apparently those who’ve made it to the next stage should know within a week or so. Which is a pretty fast turnaround, and suggests that they might well be going by the standard practice of reading the first ten pages to assess whether or not to put the script through. If that is the case, maybe I should do a check and make sure that the first third is mind-grabbingly terrific… or perhaps I should affix some kind of irresistible bribe to one of the first ten pages? A fifty quid note, perhaps? A small chocolate bar? Maybe even a small, but saucy picture from my portfolio?

Actually, no, that last idea’s not appropriate, is it? After all, I want to advance on the basis of my writing abilities, not because of my appearance, people can be so catty if they think that’s how you’ve got where you are in life (see, no matter what you might have heard, I DID learn something from all that time at Law School).

Against The ‘graine

About five or six times a year, I get migraine headaches.

Migraines are all a bit of a mystery on a medical level – the triggers and symptoms vary from person to person, and the exact cause of them is still not quite clear – but they’re also rather oddly viewed on a social level; a lot of people seem to equate a migraine with a very bad headache, so people will say ‘I think I’m getting a migraine’ when it’s really not the case.

‘Classic migraines’ are preceded by what’s known as an ‘aura’ – a period of blurry or otherwise distorted vision; in many cases (and in mine) what’s called a scotoma appears as a metallic-looking disturbance within the field of vision, shimmering as if moving or reflecting light. It’s an odd thing, but to be honest since a lot of migraines are accompanied by feelings of nausea or active vomiting, it’s only one of many things that a person with a migraine has to go through.

In a lesser number of cases (again, including me), the onset of a migraine is accompanied by pins and needles in the hands and face, difficulty with speech, and a general sense of confusion. It’s always nice to feel special or part of a limited group, but on this occasion I’d rather not, as this is a profoundly weird stage when a migraine hits – before now, I’ve been lying down in the dark, and though I’ve been able to think ‘My name is John’, there’s some sort of scrambling going on in the language centres of my head, rendering any attempt to say the phrase more like something you’d expect to hear from Joseph ‘John’ Merrick.

Having a migraine is a strange experience, and it’s far from pleasant. There are a number of tablets available which treat migraines (though I’m not aware of any which prevent them), and I’ve tried the herb feverfew, but for me it seems the best cure is just to lie in a darkened room, away from light or noise or strong smells, until it passes.

Anyway, the reason I bring this up is because I recently read a ‘beginner’s guide’-type booklet on the subject (you can get a copy of the booklet here). If you or someone you care about does have the misfortune to have migraines, it might be useful. If you’re a more seasoned migraine sufferer, or just keen to learn more about this strange phenomenon, you could do far worse than to read Oliver Sacks’s book on the subject, though a ‘learned reflex’ on my part means that the illustrations of the scotoma make me feel slightly as if I’m going to be unwell.

There was one bit of the booklet which I thought was rather misjudged, though; page three refers to famous people who suffered from migraines, and by way of historic examples, they offer Julius Caesar, Vincent van Gogh, and Elvis Presley. High-profile chaps, all three, but let’s just take a moment to examine their fates, shall we?

– Caesar died after being stabbed repeatedly by people he’d thought were his allies.
– Van Gogh suffered depression for much of his life before fatally wounding himself with a gunshot to the chest
– Presley died on the toilet with what appears to have been a violent heart attack, amongst other medical conditions

Rather a running theme of tragic, painful death there – hardly makes a ‘migraineur’ feel as if their story’s going to end happily, does it?

The Truth Isn’t Always A Beacon That Lights Our Way, Sometimes We Stumble Upon It

Me, ranting on Sunday afternoon:

“I really don’t get it when people are so keen on Sex And The City, I really don’t.

I mean, it’s totally phony and unrealistic, and seems to suggest that if you go out and buy some stuff, your life will be perfect, which has to be unhealthy.

And the worst thing about it is that people seem to take it seriously – a worrying number of women I know quote from things in it as if they’re real situations and as if you can learn from it, despite the fact that half the things they say sound cool or seem to make some kind of sense at first, but when you actually think about them, they’re meaningless, and total breakdowns in logical thinking and… oh my god. I’ve just realised.

Sex And The City is Top Gear for women, isn’t it?”

The Best Man For The Job, Rather Alarmingly

So, my best Oscar Wilde impression there. I’m certainly working on the rotundity of the post-Reading years, I fear.

Anyway, as you can probably deduce from the picture, I was at a wedding over the weekend – and a fab one it was too, probably one of the best I’ve ever attended, as it was amazingly relaxed. And I say this despite being the Best Man, so you’d think I’d have been all stressed and harried because of my role, but not so.

Doing the speech was, for an egomaniac like me, a delight, and it went over well; I’ll cheerfully admit that I wanted to get tears from some members of the audience for some of the bits of the speech, and indeed there was some dabbing at the corner of the eyes from some of the attendees (though the cynical might suspect this is more to do with suffering than a surge of emotion). And laughter at other points in the speech, which made my ego swell in a way that I only later realised I’d known before.

It was, I suddenly thought, like the times when I used to dabble at stand-up comedy; when it was going well, you could get the crowd to go with you on some of the more fanciful notions, and the brain seemed to think of things and put them into words faster than you might otherwise have thought possible. Like in writing or painting or many other fun pursuits (yes, even that one) you feel very much one with the moment, and the gap between thought and action is startlingly small.

When it goes badly, on the other hand, it’s embarrassing (though that doesn’t really worry me much, on the basis that it’s only a handful of minutes out of my life, usually in front of people I’ll never see again) but more than anything it feels clunky and awkward, as if the words and the ideas themselves are fundamentally wrong in some way. Professional comedians speak of how a joke that kills one night will itself die a death the next, and though I hardly did that many stand-up spots, I certainly had my fair share of ‘hmm, that one worked fine last time’ moments.

Anyway, that’s all rather by the by (and certainly in the past), though it was interesting to have a taste of it once again. M’colleague has suggested that perhaps I should see about becoming a professional best man, which – like so many things he says – I doubt is at all plausible, but one does see adverts offering the services of professional speechwriters, after all. Maybe I could become the Sam Seaborn of the Wedding Speech world ?

Yes, I know, he’s better-looking than me, but I’m talking about the writing of speeches here, not the power to make women swoon…

Despite Looking And Behaving Like This, I Am (Amazingly) Getting Married This Year

What better way to celebrate this, my 500th post, than by badly making the picture to the left, which inexplicably makes me look rather cross-eyed?

Well, yes, I’m sure there are many better ways, but it’s done now, so we’ll all have to get over it.

Anyway, 500 posts feels like something of a milestone, and the timing’s ideal in that this week I’ve been fortunate enough to see this blog linked to by the BBC Writersroom Blog and Stevyn Colgan’s blog alike. Forget happyslapping or having a Kanye West ringtone, linking to this blog is what all the cool kids are doing. Oh, yes it is.

So, thanks to you all for your ongoing eyeball time, and hello and welcome to any recently acquired readers – I can assure you that pictures such as the one accompanying this post are not standard practice, so don’t be afraid to come back again soon.

(Apologies, of course, to Gerard Butler for the above. And Frank Miller and Zack Snyder too. But if you think this bit of ‘for my own personal amusement’ non-artistry is bad, you really ought to check out the work of so-called professionals on Photoshop Disasters. Seriously – they get paid for that stuff…)

In Which I Wonder If I Can Take It As Well As Dish It Out

I read about a new(ish) London-based Literary Agency recently, and so last week I sent off some sample chapters of my completed novel ‘Human Noises’ and other bits of ‘please think about representing me’ material to them. And so the waiting begins.

I’ve had… well, let’s say ‘mixed experiences’ with contacting Literary Agents before – to the extent that m’colleague and I used to have a running competition to see who could get the most disappointing response; he won, though whether you could consider that a victory in the strict sense is certainly open to debate.

When the novel’s being mulled over, I always tend to adhere to the idea that no news, as per the cliché, will be good news – within reason. For the first couple of months, I can delude myself that people are meeting in boardrooms and banging their fists on tables as they shout about the bidding war for TV and Film Rights, but after a while I have to accept that the chances are it’s a no – as the ex-Literary Agent Betsy Lerner put it, “No one reads a manuscript, loves it, and doesn’t call the author”. Very true.

Still, while I’m waiting to hear, I shall plug on with the current writing, can’t have all my chocolate eggs in one basket and all that.

In related news: over the course of the weekend, I had the pleasure of reading a short screenplay script by Dom, which was both fun to read and an interesting exercise, as one of the first – and very worst – things which people do when commenting on something someone else’s work is to automatically start thinking of how they would have written it. Which isn’t even close to useful – what I want from people who read my work is a genuine appraisal of which bits work, which bits don’t, what needs to be clarified or dropped, and things like that; not a wholesale rewrite (unless the grammar and structure is worse than I could possibly fear) to make it read like someone else’s work.

Whilst I’m not going to delude myself that I’m likely to challenge the likes of people like Lucy and Lianne, who will both read scripts for you and give you an analysis (tell them I sent ya), I have to say that I enjoyed reading and reviewing Dom’s script, as it meant trying to make sure I can use proper words and terms (though, I hope, not jargon) to explain my thoughts about something which can often seem quite nebulous and tricky to describe. Here’s hoping Dom finds my remarks (which I’ve e-mailed over, Dom) useful.

Of course, I may well be less willing to ‘take it’ if the agency gets back to me with a list of brutal but true reasons why ‘Human Noises’ is a pile of pants, but as I say, at the moment, I’m dreaming of the early-morning meetings where high-powered people argue over who gets me as a client.

Yes, yes, I know – but let me dream for a bit, eh ?

Fragments From My Weekend, Pretty Much Verbatim

Saturday Morning, WHSmith –

Cashier:
Do you want to buy The Times? If you do, that bottle of water will be free.

Me:
No thanks.

Cashier:
Well, it’ll work out cheaper if you do.

Me:
Maybe so, but it’ll take more than that for me to touch The Times with these hands.

Saturday Evening, a Bar –

Quite Drunk Man:
… I mean, sometimes I just want to throw a brick through the window of Tesco’s, or set the place on fire. I’m an anarchist. What do you do for a living?

Me:
Currently, I work for a branch of the Police.

Declare Your Independents Part One Of Two: Joking Apart

After I left college in 1992, I was wallowing in self-pity (or licking my wounds, you be the judge) following a relationship breakup. I was living at home with my parents, as well as doing the odd bit of stand-up comedy – unsurprisingly, relationships material featured heavily. In January 1993, the TV series Joking Apart was broadcast on BBC2, featuring Robert Bathurst as a sitcom writer whose wife had left him, and in which we’d often see him performing imaginary stand-up sets in his head, starting with the line ‘My wife left me’. For some reason I can’t possibly begin to fathom, my father said I might enjoy the programme.

He was, as he often is when it comes to recommendations, absolutely right; Joking Apart was a terrific combination of wordplay and farce, often with a touch of genuine emotion thrown in – though this shouldn’t really come as any kind of surprise, as it was written by Stephen Moffat. Who, some of you might ask, is he? And I sneer at you and say, he’s the chap who invented Press Gang, Coupling, and has written some of the best episodes of the revived Doctor who (‘Blink’ and ‘The Girl in the Fireplace’, for example).

The first series of Joking Apart was well received, shown twice on BBC2, and even won the Bronze Rose of Montreux. So the wise owls at the BBC delayed showing the second series for the best part of a year, never repeated it, didn’t commission a third series, and of course never released either series on video. Sigh.

Time passed: my emotional wounds healed, I left home, and gradually stopped doing stand-up. My father and I would occasionally talk about ‘Joking Apart’ (partly spurred on by Robert Bathurst’s starring role in Cold Feet, and our shared love of Moffat’s later show Coupling). But while we merely talked about it, some people did something about it. Ladies and Gents, please doff your virtual hats to the hero of this tale: Craig Robins.

Rather than just sitting around thinking ‘wouldn’t it be nice if I could watch Joking Apart again?’, Craig contacted the appropriate wing of the BBC and bought the rights to produce a DVD of Joking Apart. A professional videotape editor, Craig used his skills to remaster the sound and vision on the recordings. In 2006, he issued a DVD of series one, and then last month, released series two (a double-DVD set, no less).

I bought them both last week, and eagerly watched all twelve episodes over the weekend, and this post is by way of both a review and a hearty recommendation; these are extremely high-quality productions – the shows presented are still very funny and clever, but rather than just leave it at that, Craig’s created extras for the DVDs – ‘making of’ features and new cast and creator commentaries.

As you can see from the picture above, these DVDs don’t look ‘home-made’ in the slightest (the two DVD boxes even match when stood alongside each other on the shelf), and Craig has done what I consider to be a brilliant job of turning his enthusiasm into something that others can enjoy. So, in case you hadn’t already guessed, I urge you to buy these DVDs – if nothing else, it’d be a great way for you to show your support for quality comedy DVD releases when so many huge firms seem to feel that an ‘Interactive Menu’ constitutes an extra feature.

Craig’s set up his own firm, Replay, whose website can be found here. The site is as professional as the DVDs, and I received my DVDs within a day of ordering them, so I can’t fault the service on any level. And you get a discount if you buy the complete set.

Go on, support the independent folks instead of giving money to Global Omnicorp Inc. You won’t regret it.

(My thanks to Craig – obviously, for all his hard work in making a fun show available once more, but also for his permission to post about the history of the project).

Page 16 of 19

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén