Category: Fish In A Barrel Page 20 of 23

Say My Name

I found this CD the other day, and try as I might, I can’t identify the artist.

Anyone out there in blogland have any idea who it is ?

From The Cover Of The Current Issue Of ‘Now’ Magazine

Secret [see-krit]
noun. Something kept hidden or concealed; a mystery, reason or explanation not immediately or generally apparent; a method, formula, plan, etc., known only to the initiated or the few.
adjective. Something not on the cover of a tatty celebrity magazine.

Transcript Of Phonetap Recording Made in 2006 Under The US Patriot Act

[Telephone connection is made]

Australian National Eric Bana: Hello?

Unknown voice: Eric, baby. It’s your agent here. How are ya?

Bana: I’m fine, thanks. What’s new? Got anything good for me?

Unknown: Well, just got a new script in this morning, but I don’t think it’s quite right, really.

Bana: Not quite right? Why?

Unknown: I’ll send it over, but it’s a historical drama – and after Troy, I didn’t think you’d be into that.

Bana: Hmm, you might be right. Still, what’s it about?

Unknown: That English King, Henry the Eighth.

Bana: What, the chubby King? That’s not very flattering, is it?

Unknown: No, but I think they’re trying to move away from the stereotype.

Bana: I guess so – like Colin Farrell having highlights when he played Alexander the Great.

Unknown: Something like that, yes.

Bana: Anyway, so I’d be playing Henry the Eighth?

Unknown: That’s the offer.

Bana: Who’s the director?

Unknown: Justin Chadwick.

Bana: I’ve never heard of him.

Unknown: No, you wouldn’t have, it’s his first movie.

Bana: Oh, right. What about the screenwriter?

Unknown: It’s Peter Morgan. He wrote that film about the Queen the other year.

Bana: That was nominated for an Oscar, wasn’t it? Hmm, that’s a bit more promising. What’s the basic premise?

Unknown: You play Henry, and the two Boleyn sisters fight over you. I’ll be honest, Eric, I think you’re the last major character to be cast, and the money might not be too good.

Bana: Okay, I understand. So who’s attached to it already? Who are the women who’ll be fighting over me?

Unknown: Hold on a second, I’ll just check… yes, here we are. Natalie Portman plays Anne Boleyn, and Scarlett Johansson plays her sister Mary.

Bana: And there are love scenes with both of them?

Unknown: In the script I’ve got here, yes.

Bana: Tell them I’ll do it for ten dollars.

LINK: Unintelligent (Graphic) Design

In this post, I referred to some shockingly poor quality photoshop work which had somehow evaded quality control, and made it into the public arena.

Many more examples, some of which are rather creepy as well, can be found at the oddly compelling Photoshop Disasters blog.

Caution: features pictures of more than one woman with an excessive number of hands. No, seriously.

Yes, I Will Be Sending This To Private Eye

Spotted in the London Paddington branch of WHSmith.

I like to think that the near-obliteration of the A and the subtle amending of the G into an O is entirely deliberate.

And while we’re taking cheap shots, is it just my imagination, or is that one of the least convincing photo-montage jobs of all time? Sergeant Pepper’s looked more like all the people were actually there, and that was in 1967 or so.

(Note to my American readers: don’t be fooled by Morgan’s appearance on various TV shows over there, he’s not any kind of representative of the UK; for example,not many of us Limeys have been fired from our newspaper editing jobs for publishing fake photos purporting to show British servicemen urinating on Iraqi prisoners. In fact, the number of British people who are on record for doing so is very slight – just 1 in something like 60 million.)

Marijuana-Hailing-Water-Boiling-Device Quote Of The Week*

“There’s a difference between having surgery and having over-the-top surgery.”

– Katie ‘Jordan’ Price, who had her breasts increased from 32B to 32G, and then reduced to 32F, criticising another woman for having breast implant surgery (quoted in ‘Star’ magazine, coverdated 3 March 2008)

*Which is to say, pot calling kettle.

You May Need To Enlarge This To Appreciate It… As The Microbiologist Said To The Lab Technician

Spotted in London last week, a sharp reminder of the need to always read the small print at the bottom.

In what way are the sweets like a jacuzzi, I wonder?

Unintelligent Design: Clink The Link If Ye Dare

If ever an item defined ‘unintelligent design’, this little beauty would be it.

Buy one today for someone you hate.

And I Have Thoughts Like This Going Round My Head Every Waking Second Of The Day. It’s Not Right, Surely?

So, first there was the film First Blood, the title of which makes sense.
Then the follow-up was called Rambo :First Blood Part II. So, a sequel number with a subtitle-type-thing. Okay.
But the third film was called Rambo III, which suggests Rambo I and II had preceded it, right? They hadn’t, though – unless First Blood Part II was actually called Rambo… but if that was the case, why is the new film in the series just called Rambo? Surely it should be Rambo IV (if it follows Rambo III in the series, which it seems to chronologically), or even Rambo II, to plug the missing gap between Rambo (First Blood Part II) and Rambo III, if it were a ‘prequel’… but I don’t think it is.
Oh, my head hurts from thinking about it all. We know Sylvester can count – he had no trouble using roman numerals on the Rocky films, did he? Then again, he did call the last one by the character’s full name, so maybe I should just stop dwelling on this pedantry.
I have to say, you never have this problem with the work of his french relative Arthur Rambo*.
*This terrible pun first used in my earshot by my father, who used to say that you could tell a person’s intellect by asking ‘what do you think of the work of [phonetic] Ramm-boe?’ I’ve since seen it in other places, including Grant Morrison and Paul Grist’s comic St Swithin’s Day.

It Was Five Years Ago Today

On 15 February 2003, an estimated two million people marched to protest against War in Iraq, and this column on the Guardian website says, I think, pretty much all that can be said about it. A very strong bit of writing, I think, and his point about the divide between government and the people is one which I’d cheerfully agree with; I’ve posted before about how I disagree that ‘apathy’ is why voting turnout is on the decline, and I think the way the protests were discounted in the rush to declare war is an example of why it’s more the fault of the parties, in and out of power, failing to actually listen to the public that makes people feel disenfranchised.

(Mind you, I’m not pretending that publishing this terrific column in any way means the Guardian is a good newspaper, given that within a day of publishing it they also published this, which appears to have been written by the son of someone who’s worked for the Guardian before. And which was rapidly given a good kicking by people posting comments, leading to the thread being locked by moderators. And then this response, which contains an amusingly provocative distinction in its final paragraph. So no, I won’t be buying the Guardian any time soon – ich bin nicht ein Berliner Leser and all that.)

Page 20 of 23

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén