Boss: Gareth, got a job for you.
Category: Fish In A Barrel Page 18 of 23
If I understand the reviews and the book’s general description correctly, it’s a pretty scary and searing indictment of the people who are manipulating world events to create a climate of fear from which they profit financially.
All pretty interesting, and more than a little creepy. But… well, the book sounds like it’s going to unnerve me and alarm me about the state of the world today, and it has a cover price of £8.99.
You see what I’m driving at here, right?
Taking a highly selective trawl through the films of Eddie Murphy, and loading my argument, sure, but…
1988: Coming To America
Characters Played: 4
Academy Award Nominations: None
1996 : The Nutty Professor
Characters Played: 7
Academy Award Nominations: None
1999: Bowfinger
Characters Played: 2
Academy Award Nominations: None
2000: Nutty Professor II: The Klumps
Characters Played: 8
Academy Award Nominations: None
2006: Dreamgirls
Characters Played: 1
Academy Award Nomination: Actor in a Supporting Role
2006: Norbit
Characters Played: 3
Academy Award Nominations: None
… luckily, Eddie seems to have spotted the pattern I’m alluding to, and his next few films feature him just taking home one salary. Good for him.
Next time on John’s unsolicited career advice: Mike Myers (hint: doing Austin Powers with an Indian accent doesn’t constitute creativity, and may actually be a bit racist).
The passing of a mere three years, and I think we all have to agree that Stephen ‘Tintin’ Duffy looks really very different.
Amazing what they can do nowadays.
(In case it worries you, I’m not having a go at the Duffster at all; her album’s a great listen, and I certainly like it as much as her surnamesake’s work with The Lilac Time and the like. But as regular readers will know by now, I’m not going to let the fact I actually like someone’s work get in the way of a cheap and puerile post.)
To: Trevor Stephens, Marketing and Communications
cc: Paula Hennings, COO
Subject: TV Advert
Dear Trevor
Many thanks for sending me a preview DVD of the new advert. I gather we’ve booked a series of TV slots for this one, mainly during programmes aimed at the female viewer.
One question, though: are you actually aware of what an advert is meant to do? In case you’re not sure, it’s meant to make people want to buy the product, which usually involves actually saying what the item is, what it does, and minor details like that.
Instead, you seem to have wasted our ten seconds, and the not inconsiderable budget we gave you, on stating the company name, and doing a little play on the name – which might have been quite witty if you’d actually made the name up, but you didn’t, and we knew full well that there was a homonym element to it when we named the company.
As I don’t know what you think you’re doing, or where the money’s gone, I’ve instructed IT to disable your system logon as of noon today, and security have been told to remove you from the premises if you’re still at your desk then.
Please make it easy for all of us and leave with some dignity, and we’ll all pretend that this never happened – I can’t imagine it’s something you’ll want to include in your showreel.
Yours
Derek
Job done, knock off and head to the pub. Well done!
Firstly, I think we can conclude that the Evening Standard believe that the time to be alarmed when you see someone carrying a rucksack is now over. Good to know.
And secondly… well, do I really need to say anything about this headline? ‘Menace’? I mean, come on… ‘menace’?
Manly words! Grr! Words dripping with testosterone and sweat, words which could render women pregnant by reading them individually, but when they’re put together in a row like that… well, we’re clearly talking about a product used by hairy-chested sex gods.
But! Having already plonked two manly words after ‘Fusion’, have Gillette backed themselves into a corner? Are there any remaining words which are so butch they have a Y chromosome? That, my bloggy pals, is the question in today’s competition*, and you – yes, YOU – could win yourself a fantastic prize**!
So, what word or words should Gillette slap on their razors the next time they re-brand? Here are a few of my ideas, but I want to hear from you!
– War
– Goal
– Bomb
– Rottweiler
– Tackle
– Pint
– Geezer
– Transit
– Cock
Post your entry as a Comment, and you could win a very special prize indeed!***
Enter now! This minute! Please enter now! Oh god, I can’t stop using exclamation marks! Help me! Someone! Please!
ENTER NOW!
*It’s not a competition. There is no prize.
**No you couldn’t. He’s lying to you.
***He’s lying again. Frankly, he’s as trustworthy as an ITV phone-in quiz.
… but it’s worth sharing, I think; just to give the background; Barack Obama suggested it might be quite a good thing to talk to the USA’s enemies, and various people – including, I gather, Bush – accused him of appeasement, and referred to Neville Chamberlain.
Cue one of Bush’s supporters repeating this sentiment, and then demonstrating the perils of swallowing the party line and not actually knowing what you’re talking about.
(Hope this works out all right, my first time embedding a Youtube video…)