Category: London Page 4 of 12

Do You Live In Plymouth? You Do? Get Out!

… by which, of course, I mean that you can go out tonight to a roadshow event hosted by the BBC Writersroom. It’s rather short notice, I know – which is why I’ve taken that inappropriate and peremptory tone, to attract your attention – but you may be able to make it.

It is, in fact, one of a number of events which the nice folks at the Writersroom are holding over the next few months – here’s a list:

Tuesday 2 June
Plymouth Theatre Royal

Wednesday 17 June
Sheffield Lyceum Theatre

Wednesday 1 July
Liverpool Everyman Theatre (part of Festival)

Friday 3 July
Nottingham Broadway Cinema (part of festival)

As is usual with these events, you need to make sure that you e-mail in advance to get on the list, but they’re all free, and in my experience of the bashes they’ve held here in London, well worth going along if you can.

Full details – including more info on times and the addresses of the venues – can be found here.

Trendwatch: The Word That Seems To Be On MPs’ Tongues And Printing Presses Alike

I’ve written several times before about what a rubbish newspaper I consider the London Evening Standard to be, and it’s recently taken the unusual – some might say downright strange – step of apologising for its editorial stance (mainly because it has a new owner and change of editorial line-up). A sample of the ad campaign is shown here.

I certainly wouldn’t argue with the assessment of it as being negative – the selection of headlines here gives a flavour of its previous approach – but given that the paper’s previously been running a loyalty card scheme which enables readers to register and pay a bit upfront and get the paper cheaper , I have one question:

Are people who bought issues of the Evening Standard before the relaunch going to be given refunds?

Next Weekend, I Shall Go Into The Woods With The Men’s Group And Recite Poetry As Another Man Strikes A Drum

A boyish afternoon yesterday, as Mrs Soanes and I rather belatedly cashed in a wedding pressie from Mr and Mrs Toby; a voyage on a Rigid Inflatable Boat (RIB) down the Thames.

It was, for the record, fab, and if you get the chance to clamber into one of these boats and go wheeeeeeee down the Thames (or any other river, for that matter), I recommend it. Anyway, here are some pictures…

Passing the Houses of Parliament. Look at the spray there! Why, it’s almost like the start of The World Is Not Enough).

It may look as if I’m emulating The Shadow, but in fact the lifejacket they gave me was being blown back by the sheer force of the wind as we sped along. That explains the swept-back hair, too. Well, that and my insistence on styling myself like some kind of fop-about-town, but that’s a topic for another time.

Mrs Soanes, scooting along at my side in the RIB. How does she keep smiling, when she’s married to me? I really don’t know, but I’m not going to question it out loud, in case she starts to question it as well, and at the moment I seem to be getting away with it. Shh, don’t spoil it.

On getting out of the RIB and once again onto dry land, we wandered along London’s South Bank, where, as part of the BFI’s James Bond Weekender, they’re exhibiting a number of cars from the Bond films.

Here, you can see me pointing at an Aston Martin from Goldeneye, as if mocking its blatancy as an *ahem* extension for the insecure male. Meanwhile, a passer-by points at a part of me as if to suggest that perhaps I’m in need of just such an extension. Tch, everyone’s a critic. Still, he could have been pointing about a foot higher at my gut (something which I could actually do something to correct, though in my defence I’d just had a splendid lunch).

So, a positively manly afternoon – racing along the river at a rate of knots, followed by looking at cars from Bond films. Grr, frankly. I can almost feel a hair sprouting on my chest. Which is a first.

500 of 1910, Two Men, A Queue

An interesting event if you’re a fan of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, though I can’t make it (grr)…

Creators Alan Moore and Kevin O’Neill will be signing the first volume of the new series, Century: 1910 at Gosh!, my favoured comic shop in London, next Saturday (2nd May), from 2pm-5pm.

More intriguingly, as the book doesn’t come out until the end of May, 500 copies are apparently being specially air-freighted over for this event. Unfortunately for those of us who can’t make it, they’re not takng reservations for signed copies of the book – the advance copies are going to be available exclusively on the day of the signing, and they’ll be limited to two copies per customer.

If you can make it, it’s obviously a rare chance to get the book signed by both creators, but if not… well like me, you’ll have to wait until the end of May.

I Want You To Learn From My Mistakes. Lord Knows, I Seem Incapable Of Doing So.

Like Alan Partridge in the Linton Travel Tavern, or … um, thingy in Man In A Suitcase, my lovely wife and I spent the last week or so living out of a suitcase (well, a couple of them) in a hotel not far from our home.

In case you’re assuming that the accumulation of books and CDs and DVDs had reached the stage where it was easier for us to move out and leave the material possessions to take over the flat, fear not; this was a planned re-location while we had sturdy artisans in replacing the kitchen and bathroom (including tearing out the plumbing and re-plastering the ceilings), and we decided it was best to move elsewhere and keep out of their way.

Living within twenty minutes of home, but not actually at home, was a strange experience; kind of limbo-like, but pleasant enough (the hotel was nice, and had room service, so no complaints there), even if towards the end of it we were keen to get home.

Anyway, I learned various things from the experience, and I thought I’d share them with you. Hints ‘n’ tips, as it were.

If you’re staying away from home whilst renovation work’s being carried out, for pity’s sake, do not pop home to see how it’s going.

I can’t stress this enough. It’s always a bit weird to be away from home anyway, but if you then return to the location you’re feeling faintly disconnected from only to see it in a state of disrepair, it’s not going to cheer you up one bit.

The sight which confronted us on a halfway-through visit home was pretty horrifying – pipes sticking out of walls at scary angles, light fittings hanging from the ceiling like slabs of animal carcase in one of those refrigerated lorries, and so much dust it looked as if it had been snowing indoors. A scene of devastation, in short, not seen in London’s East End since the Blitz*.

I think it was Thomas Wolfe who wrote that you can never go home. As regards popping in to see how the work’s going, make that you shouldn’t go home.

Unaccustomed to hard graft? That makes two of us. Keep at least one eye on your surroundings.

For example, if you’re lifting a box of floor tiles onto a trolley, make sure that you don’t glance away long enough for the trolley to get bored of being an inanimate object, and suddenly go all animated.

In my experience, the trolley will roll towards you whilst your attention is elsewhere, hit the back of your leg, and cause you to fall onto the trolley. This fall will be assisted by the weight of the box of tiles, which you’ll need to keep clutched to you like a newborn for fear of them breaking. I’ve found that while all this is going on, your partner will be unable to do anything but watch… with eyes wide and barely-suppressed amusement. Their laughter begins when you land on your arse on the trolley. Hmph.

On being White Van Man, howsoever fleetingly

Driving a hired van to take unwanted furniture and rubble to the local tip – I’m sorry, I mean Re-use and Re-Cycle Centre – is, for the vast majority of men, a very exciting event.

Perched above the normal-sized vehicles, your lofty throne makes you look and feel like King of the dual carriageway. Enjoy it, but don’t get too blase about your new-found status, for pride comes before a fall (and you can easily fall out if you’re not careful when dismounting). Following what happened to me the other day, I make two recommendations about how to conduct yourself, so you don’t fall from grace even remotely as swiftly as I did.

Recommendation 1: When driving a transit van, don’t look in the rear view mirror. There isn’t one. Use the side mirrors instead. Mind you, when you’re reversing, pedestrians will probably take the opportunity to walk across the back of the van – that is, the blind spot between the mirrors’ visible spots. So, I recommend you stick the hazard lights on, and whenever you’re about to reverse, give it an extra 15 seconds’ wait to make sure it really is clear. I didn’t hit anyone, but from the way people were keen to leap behind the van every time I even thought about reversing, I can only assume there was a puddle behind my vehicle and pedestrians were intent on using their entire bodies to impersonate Sir Walter Raleigh’s cloak. So, look, and then wait. And then think about moving.

Recommendation 2: When you’re driving a rented van, take a moment to ascertain the height of the van before you go anywhere. This moment of research may seem like a waste of time, but it will in fact help you to avoid a close – some might even say intimate – encounter with a Maximum Headroom sign as you drive into a supermarket car park. If, however, you do what I did, and ask “hmm, are we going to get under that bar, do you think?” before hearing a very loud THUNK overhead, make sure you’ve paid for the full insurance cover on the van so you don’t have to pay the excess. God bless you, Mastercover Plus.

… and there endeth the lessons. Well, the lessons that can be learned from my recent experiences. On the basis of my past performance in relation to lessons – both those within the classroom and elsewhere – it’s debatable whether I’ll actually learn anything, but if nothing else, I like to think that this post shows that I’m at least aware of my mistakes.

All the better, of course, to repeat them, with added stupidity.

*There is, I appreciate, the possibility that this is overstating it a bit. But as my sister once said, “Oh, everyone always exaggerates everything”.

The Last Time I Saw Someone All Over BBC Continuing Drama Like This, It Was Slater Week

In amongst a crowd of rowdy hooligans in a pub the other day (yes, they were writers), I met Paul Campbell. Paul seemed a friendly chap, and he’s also rather prolific and successful on the writing front.

How successful, you ask? Well, tonight on BBC1, he has not one, but two programmes being shown with his name in the Written By credit – and what’s more, they’re straight after each other, making for a full 90 minutes of prime-time schedule that’s sprung from his words.

Crikey.

If we’re going to split hairs, though, there will be one of those questionable 90-second ‘news updates’ between the two programmes, but I wouldn’t be entirely surprised if Paul finds some way to work himself into the events of the day, as he was muttering darkly about streaking across Parliament Square to ensure the news coverage.

Oh, all right, I made that last bit up; but if you are watching TV in Blighty tonight, why not have a look at one of (or even both of) the programmes Paul’s written? He wrote tonight’s EastEnders (7.30pm) and Holby City (8pm).

As I say, he’s a thoroughly friendly chap, and it’s always good to see the decent sorts doing well, innit?

Bobby Mack’s In Town. No, Not Billy Mack From Love Actually.

I’ll be honest, I wasn’t entirely convinced by Robert McKee’s Story.

It explains itself well as it goes along, and gives good examples and the like, but at the end of it all I just felt slightly overwhelmed by the almost algorithmic charts and equations involved, and something about it didn’t quite sit right with me. It’s entirely possible that I lost the thread somewhere along the way, and that I’m resenting the theory for my lack of understanding, but it could just be that it’s a matter of horses for courses, every particular writer having son gout, and all that.

So anyway, I don’t quite adhere to McKee’s approach, but I certainly couldn’t discount it either – a lot of people are big fans, and if nothing else, he’s passionate about trying to discern what makes some stories work and others flounder – so it’s only right that I point out that he’s in the UK – specifically London – next week, doing some of his seminars; one on Love Stories, and then his famous Story Seminar.

It’s short notice, yes, but I only found out myself last night, and I’m breaking away from my hot cross buns (not a euphemism) to post this, so it’s as fast as I could letcha know, all right?

Good.

Well, now we’ve got that settled, this is the link you need to click for more details.

And I note one level of the tickets entitles you to a free copy of Final Draft – however, as people who buy it from authorised suppliers are eligible for a free copy of the new version which is due in May, you might want to make sure that, if you get it this way, you’ll also be entitled to the free upgrade.

(On which theme, I’ll be interested to see what people think of FD v8 when it comes out; I’ve been using Celtx and Word and waiting to hear that FD’s new version is more readily compatible with Vista.)

BBC Writersroom : Armando Iannucci Q&A

This seems to be tucked away in one of the back pockets of the BBC Writersroom site, so it may have escaped your notice…

On Wednesday 15 April 2009 from 5:00pm to 6:30pm at the Soho Theatre in London, Armando Iannucci will be talking about In The Loop, the new film semi-spin-off from The Thick Of It. No doubt, though, he’ll be asked (and hopefully answering) questions about other work from his resume.

It’s free to attend, though you need to get your name on the list, which you can do by e-mailing writersroom.events@bbc.co.uk, with the subject line “Armando Iannucci Q&A.”

That’s about all you need to know, but if you want to be sure I’m not just making it all up (I might be hopped up on a dangerous combo of tea and chocolate), the official page about it is here.

I’m planning on attending, howsabout you?

I Thought I Saw Some Rhubarb To Go With It, But It Was Just Celery With High Blood Pressure

You can see the details of the story here or here, but I love the way it led to one of the most ridiculous Evening Standard headline boards ever.

And let’s face it, that takes some doing.

This Post Contains Material Which Some Readers May Find Shocking Or Offensive

Presented for your bewilderment, a display table I saw in Waterstones on Piccadilly the other night.

Normally, I mock similarly-designed items, but having a go at these near-identical covers feels a bit like stealing sweets from a baby (though of course that’s far more civilised behaviour than the subject matter of these books).

For those of you who aren’t familiar with these books, which are often racked under ‘Tragic Lives’ or similar in bookshops, they tend to be memoirs of terrible suffering which the authors suffered in their childhood, but which are presented as being ultimately uplifting. Often they’re the tales of horrific levels of abuse (verbal, physical, sexual and psychological), and thus the covers invariably feature an upset-looking child.

If I sound vague about the contents or dismissive about the marketing, that’s because I haven’t read any of them (though I’m told the initial books of this nature by Dave Pelzer are quite readable), and the packaging of them often ends up being unintentionally amusing to my obviously sick mind (the best example being Ma, He Sold Me For A Few Cigarettes – seriously, that’s a real book; click the link and see).

As I understand it, these books are known as ‘Misery-Lit’ or even ‘Bleakbusters’, and they sell very well indeed. They’re not the sort of book that I think Iā€™d care to read, really, and there’s a large part of me that worries about the fine line that one has to tread between concern about an issue such as mistreatment of others, and a slightly unhealthy and voyeuristic interest in the specifics of the mistreatment; see Apt Pupil by Stephen King for an example of an obsession with ‘the gooshy stuff’ taken to an extreme level (he said, loading his argument)

One thing I recently read about these books, though, is that they’re ‘publishing’s dirty little secret’ (the irony of this is, I hope, not lost on the industry); whilst the various publishers wouldn’t make any claim that these were literary classics or necessarily even of great social merit, the books do sell in vast quantities, and of course this helps the publishers keep afloat during these difficult financial times – books such as those pictured effectively help subsidise the other tomes which don’t speed off the shelves so quickly, but whose authors might pick up both acclaim and awards further down the line. It’s the equivalent of a record label having both Seasick Steve and Coldplay on, I guess.

As I say, I’m vaguely uncomfortable about these books, and the picture of child + hand-written title + typed strapline hinting at the horrors within formula of the covers makes me prone to mock them, but I recently read something (embarrassingly, I can’t remember where, but if anyone can point me towards the origin, I’ll gladly link to it) which suggested that within the world of publishing itself, these books aren’t exactly taken too seriously.

A number of people within publishing firms, the story goes, held a competition to make up the most archetypal and yet repellent example of a Misery-lit book title, voting for the winner. There were, I gather, a large number of entries, but the winner was, by a substantial margin, the title No, Grandad, Not On My Face.

Page 4 of 12

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén