This Said, I Am Painfully Aware There’s A Paucity Of Decent Roles For Non-White And/Or Non-Male Actors In Many Films And TV Programmes

I’m not really posting this as one of my ongoing ‘Twins’ series of posts, as the Denzil film came out a good five years before the Dalton film (1984 and 1989, film fans). But instead it reminded me of a topic which I’d been intending to post about for a while, and which is partly triggered by the fact that tomorrow is the centenary of Ian Fleming’s birth.

When they were talking about the search for a new actor to portray Bond in the films, one thing which I heard several times was ‘they should do a black Bond’ or ‘they should do a female Bond’. Indeed, some folks suggested Colin Salmon should play Bond (he seems a pretty good actor, though having appeared in the films as another character might be seen as making this a bit weird, though then again it didn’t stop Joe Don Baker or Maud Adams), though offhand I can’t recall any casting suggestions being made for a woman to play Bond.

My feelings on this sort of thing (and this applies to suggestions of a female Doctor Who as well, really, though the regeneration aspect at least gives this a slight increase in story logic, if nothing else) are slightly mixed, but I think they tend to boil down to one word: why?

I can see the thinking behind it, and agree with it completely, that there aren’t really that many high-profile non-white or female characters in English-language films (or, indeed, other media), but taking an established character and making them black or female just doesn’t seem the way to remedy this, to my mind.

Taking a comic-based example, I think it’s probably fair to say that the best-known female superhero is Wonder Woman, who was created without reference to existing male superheroes. There are a number of female superheroes who are, effectively, female versions of well-known characters (for example, Spider-Woman or She-Hulk – and no, non-comic readers, I’m not making those up), but they’ve never really taken off, and I rather suspect that’s because their rather derivative origins are all too obvious. Wonder Woman, conversely, is a distinct character, not just a transparent copy.

And in the same way, just ‘making Bond a woman’ seems to be a pretty cheap way to try to make a character popular, as does making him black (similarly, I’m not quite sure if the ‘Ultimate’ Marvel comics version of Nick Fury is really that much more interesting by the change in his race, though I gather it did make the post-credits scene of ‘Iron Man’ inevitable).

Surely the right thing to do is to try to create a female or non-white characters who have their own appeal to an audience? It would certainly seem the more creative way to go about it.

It’s not necessarily easy to do that, sure, but I genuinely believe that characters like Jane Tennison or Blade are much more memorable for not just being knock-offs of existing figures. The origin of a character – in a story and also a more meta- sense – is always likely to be far more interesting if it’s not simply something like “Well, The Fall Guy was popular, so we just made Colt Seavers female and called her Stephanie Plum” (because I’m pretty sure that’s not what Janet Evanovich did, and her novels are wildly popular).

People seem to be pretty good at sussing out when stuff is calculated or even tokenistic, and so I think that trying to make characters popular or appealing by simply tweaking one aspect of a previous hit to re-sell to a different section of your perceived audience is a bit obvious, and will be spotted pretty quickly.

At least, I like to think it’s the case that audiences are smarter than they’re often assumed to be; on a purely selfish level, I’d like to think that because it’ll mean that there will be drama and comedy features that need scripts from people like me, and not just a never-ending slew of reality TV or makeover shows.


You May Have Seen This Already…


In The Event Of Them Just Adding Another Blade Like They Usually Do, All Entries Will Be Null And Void


  1. If you make Bond a woman, it isn’t really Bond any more, which is a paradox isn’t it ?

  2. I could not agree more. Tokenism for tokenism’s sake just throws people’s paranoia about racism, sexism and any other -isms into sharp relief. Far better to develop strong female, gay, disabled, black etc. characters that are non-derivative.

    As an aside, I do recall reading a proposal about 15 years ago to do a film with all of the previous Bonds (Connery, Moore et al) appearing in it. The idea was that the name ‘James Bond’ and ‘007’ was a codename/identity owned by M and his/her people and passed from spy to spy as indeed the epithets ‘M’ and ‘Q’ have been. The plot revolved around the current Bond (I think it was Dalton then) uncovering a plot to assassinate all previous Bonds. Nice idea … and it would allow for a black Bond of course. Shame it never happened. And probably never will now. If Sean Connery passed up Indiana Jones 4, you can be pretty sure he’d pass up a Bond.

  3. That’s an interesting idea, but I doubt that Eon would allow it, as they are making so much cash out of the series as it is. Anyway, Connery is apparently enjoying retirement too much. Good luck to him, but I do miss him.

  4. Mind you, his last performance as Bond was not one I’d want to see repeated (and no, I don’t mean as John Patrick Mason)…

  5. What in ‘Actually Do Say Never Again’ ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén